Turns out, CSPI did not defend trans fats.

I just re-read CSPI’s “The Truth About Trans” from the March 1988 edition of Nutrition Action, and the overlying message I came away with was “we need more evidence to make a final decision on trans fats”. And a few years later, CSPI had all the evidence it needed to say trans fats were indeed harmful.

So it turns out that all these years, CSPI’s opponents were falsely claiming “CSPI was for trans fats before they were against them” in order to discredit CSPI.

 When I first got into food activism, I believed in the lie that CSPI defended trans fats and was responsible for trans fats being in processed foods.

So as far as I’m concerned, “CSPI was for trans fats before they were against them” is just another debunked conspiracy theory. Shame on the Center for Consumer Freedom, the Weston A. Price Foundation, and Mary G. Enig for promoting ridiculous conspiracy theories.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s