Woman stages #falseflag #hatecrime on her own #mosque.

Woman suspected of setting Iowa mosque on fire

Police in Iowa arrested a 22-year-old woman suspected of starting a small fire at an Iowa mosque Thursday morning.

Des Moines firefighters and police were called to the Islamic Center of Des Moines about 10 a.m. There had been a small fire on the carpet, according to a Des Moines police report.

The fire was extinguished by the mosque’s staff by the time firefighters arrived.

Security cameras in the mosque showed a woman, later identified as Aisha Ismail, pouring lighter fluid on the carpet and then starting the fire, said Des Moines police spokesman Sgt. Paul Parizek. Ismail was not on scene when police and firefighters arrived, according to the report.

Read more: Milwaukee woman set deadly house fire to get boyfriend out of house, charge says

Read more: When is Eid al-Fitr, and why do Muslims celebrate it?

Police arrested Ismail at a west Des Moines apartment that evening. She was booked into jail on a charge of first-degree arson.

There are no indications that this fire was a hate crime, Parizek said. Ismail attended the mosque, he said, adding that her motive for the fire was unclear.

“It doesn’t appear that she was trying to burn the place down,” Parizek said. “It seems like she was trying to make a statement.”

Damage from the fire was minimal, and no one was hurt, Parizek said.

Ismail’s jail bond was set at $25,000. She remained in custody Friday morning.

#KurtNimmo: #Antifa is an #FBI #COINTELPRO #falseflag operation. #Gladio #OperationGladio #RedBrigades #CIA #MI6 #NATO

Antifa and the Police State

April 27, 2017

Antifa and the Police State

Kurt Nimmo

In a tweet posted on Wednesday, I compared Antifa to the Red Brigades.

Not simply for their pseudo-marxism, but also because it appears the group is a classic FBI operation right out of the pages of the COINTELPRO playbook.

In 1999 it was revealed the Red Brigades were infiltrated by Italian intelligence and operatives were the masterminds behind the murder of the former prime minister Aldo Moro in 1978. Alberto Franceschini, an imprisoned former member of the terrorist group, told L’Espresso news magazine Italian intelligence “used the Red Brigades to block Moro’s attempt to bring the Communist Party into a government of national unity.”

This is a classic example of Operation Gladio and the strategy of tension in action.

We know the CIA, MI6, NATO, and Italian intelligence were responsible for Gladio operations in Italy. This was revealed in 1984 during an investigation by Italian judge Felice Casson. After he reopened the case of a car bomb in Peteano in 1972, Casson discovered the attack was the work of the military secret service Servizio Informazioni Difesa in conjunction with Ordine Nuovo, a fascist group. The attack was blamed on the Red Brigades.

Italy was the first target after the inception of the CIA in 1947. The NSC 10/2 directive of 1948 allowed the CIA to conduct covert actions anywhere in the world.

During the trial of Vincenzo Vinciguerra it was learned that instead of a “stay behind army” to resist a Soviet invasion, Gladio was used primarily to conduct false flag terror events to be blamed on leftists and communists. Vinciguerra said the idea was to “destabilize to stabilize” and move the people toward accepting a repressive police state.

The FBI’s COINTELPRO relied on intimidation, harassment, discrediting, snitch jacketing, and infiltration of targeted political groups in the United States. Agents provocateurs exploited ideological divisions within target groups, promoted enmity with other groups, and repeatedly urged and initiated violent acts, including forceful disruptions of meetings and demonstrations, attacks on police, and bombings.

The FBI followed the advice of Tsarist police director TC Zubatov: “We shall provoke you to acts of terror and then crush you.”

The CIA also did this with its Operation CHAOS, which directly violated it charter, for what it is worth.

“In 1968, the CIA’s various domestic programs were consolidated and expanded under the name Operation CHAOS,” writes Mark Zepezauer. “When Richard Nixon became president the following year, his administration drafted the Huston Plan, which called for even greater operations against ‘subversives,’ including wiretapping, break-ins, mail-opening, no-knock searches and ‘selective assassinations.’ Bureaucratic infighting tabled the plan, but much of it was implemented in other forms, not only by the CIA but also by the FBI and the Secret Service.”

As we now know, the FBI is engaged in creating terror plots and using them to frame patsies, amounting to “a form of pre-emptory prosecution where vulnerable individuals are targeted and manipulated not for any criminal acts they have committed but rather for the bad political views they have expressed,” according to Glenn Greenwald.

It’s in the state’s best interest to stir up trouble between the so-called alt-right and its opponents on the left, especially violence-prone groups on its periphery. As the violence escalates, the state will move to further enable law enforcement to go after nonviolent and legitimate protesters and provide a rationalization for further expansion of its high-tech surveillance apparatus.

It took a formal investigation to uncover the dirty secrets of Operation Gladio. If not for activists taking files from a Philadelphia FBI office in 1971, we would not know about COINTELPRO.

So far, there is little if any solid evidence Antifa is run by the FBI or the CIA. There is, however, precedent. In the 1990s, an Antifa group was infiltrated by the British police. Additionally, the group was further radicalized by the revelations of the so-called “Grant Bristow Affair” in Canada.

The Grant Bristol Affair, according to the leftist publisher Kersplebdeb, “provides a stark example of even anti-state, anti-capitalist comrades being infiltrated and manipulated by the police—and it would be ridiculous to assume that ‘Officer A’ [from a secretive unit of the Metropolitan police] in England did not have his parallels in North America. While there is no way to guarantee that one will not be targeted and neutralized by such ‘deep cover’ agents, their open existence should put to rest naive ideas of ‘working with the police’ (hate crimes units, etc.) against the fascists. If the capitalist state is ‘anti-fascist’, its antifascism is of a completely different sort than out own, and stands in direct opposition to us. Any cooperation simply increased our vulnerability.”

#WholeFoods sells out to #Amazon. #AmazonFresh to compete with #Kroger’s #ClickList online shopping service. #WholePaycheck

Comment: No big loss. Whole Paycheck is overpriced GMO shit anyway.

Amazon to Buy Whole Foods in $13.4 Billion Deal

#Feminist who attacked Asian #Lyft driver over hula girl is a #ChildPornographer. #ChildPorn #KiddiePorn #ChildPornography #AnnaLieseNielsen #LaraNielsen #GodsGirls



GodsGirls is a California-based alt porn website featuring softcore nude photography and video. The website also serves as a social networking community, featuring model and user blogs, email, discussion forums, original writing, and interviews.

GodsGirls was founded by entrepreneur Annaliese Nielsen (real name: Lara Nielsen) and model Kayla-Jane Danger (who is no longer affiliated with the site), with the backing of Offworld Media Group Inc.

In July 2009, Canadian newspaper Le Soleil stated that French-Canadian singer Cœur de pirate was a nude model for GodsGirls while she was a minor, using the name Bea.[17] In the article, Annaliese Nielsen claimed not to know Cœur de pirate or Bea. But in November 2009, Cœur de pirate, then 20 years and 2 months old, said on the Quebec television show Tout le monde en parle that photos she appeared in on the Godsgirls site were taken 2 and a half years earlier, apparently confirming that she was in fact a minor when she posed for the photos. However, GodsGirls has never been indicted for the publication of the photographs.

#WhiteSupremacist website #DailyStormer defends white #Antifa tranny who assaulted black man. #racism [WARNING: Language]

Comment: Smell the irony…a neo-Nazi website defending a shitstain white tranny because “she” assaulted a black man and told him to “go back to Africa”.

BASED Antifa Tranny in Family Guy Sweatshirt BRUTALLY ASSAULTS a Renegade Nigger!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 12, 2017

Witness, my friends, the most BASED antifa tranny you’ve ever witnessed.

In Portland this week, a group of antifa were on “niggerpatrol,” marching against “niggerdom and the proliferation of niggerism,” when they came upon a wild, roaming nigger.

BASED ANTIFA TRANNY wasn’t having none of that.

He got in the nigger’s face and called him “FASH,” which is an acronym for “Filthy Ape Shitskin Hominid.”

When the nigger refused to board the next flight to Liberia after a brief exchange of profanity, the BASED tranny attacked.

The others could be heard yelling “get the fuck off of her” – because seriously, who hits a woman?

As I have recently read on highly intellectual websites, such as Counter Currents, only sociopaths and niggers would ever hit a woman.

Real men – the true whites, such as antifa niggerpatrol, know that you have to treat women with respect. After all, in pagan religions, we honored the beauty of Aryan Princesses, and society was run by women.

And that, my friends, is what is wrong with the WHITE SHARIA LAW meme.

#SlateMagazine attacks the #FirstAmendment, equates #freespeech supporters with #Nazis. #Slate #DahliaLithwick #FreeSpeechUnderAttack

Comment: Dahlia you stupid idiot, what would happen if a Republican government was in control of an America which didn’t have a constitutional right to free speech? Yup. You dumb liberal schmucks would be persecuted and prosecuted for YOUR speech. Quit being so fucking dumb, you dumbass liberal retards, and see the bigger picture.

When the Nazis Come Marching In

I never feared the First Amendment until white supremacists came to my hometown.

| June 7, 2017

As a resident of Charlottesville, Virginia, I have been forced of late to spend too much time thinking about Nazis. In mid-May, a handful of white supremacists, Holocaust deniers, xenophobes, and recreational racists—among them Richard Spencer—marched through one of our parks with flaming torches in support of a Robert E. Lee statue that has been slated to be sold by the City Council. The demonstration grabbed headlines worldwide, the statue’s removal has been placed on a six-month hold by a judge, and the Ku Klux Klan is now seeking permission to march here in July. A few weeks after the first march, a Facebook post from a local black farmer went viral due to its suggestion that the arrival of the white supremacists was more a culmination than an inciting incident, and that the fight over the Lee monument was empty symbolism that distracted from a meaningful discussion about the systemic racism that already exists here. The post included the claim that “it isn’t Richard Spencer calling the cops on me for farming while Black. It’s nervous White women in yoga pants with ‘I’m with Her’ and ‘Coexist’ stickers on their German SUVs.” White women in yoga pants were upset. Alt-right websites rejoiced.

My little city in central Virginia has become the stuff of reality TV. The local police, who didn’t see the Lee Park thing coming, are dialed up to 11. And with threats, incitement, and actual assaults perpetrated both by alt-right sympathizers and the protesters who oppose them, their job is no longer to stand back but to surge in almost as soon as the shouting begins. Now, when we come to meet in our town square, we are uncertain of whether we are suiting up for events that fete the Constitution or violent altercations for which we should park with an eye to high-speed retreats. Lee Park itself, where my babies learned to walk, has become ground zero for people expecting the worst.

This is how I felt as I headed to a local counter-protest the morning of May 31: afraid for the first time in my 16-year residence in a town I love. I was afraid that the cycle of arrests and assaults that have followed the Richard Spencer march would lead to more arrests and assaults, afraid about where we parked the car because white supremacists in this town have followed protesters home from rallies, afraid for the first time in the small town where my kids walk everywhere alone. For the first time in a lifetime of journalism, I was also afraid to wear my press credentials because today, in this town, they might invite punching.

Last week, I had come to a place where I was thinking—if not saying aloud—that maybe it was time for me and the First Amendment to see other people. It’s not me, to be sure, it’s the First Amendment—or at least what’s become of it. I am weary of hate speech, wary of threats, and tired of the choice between punching back and acquiescing. I am sick to death of Nazis. And yet they had arrived, basically on my doorstep.

For the Framers, the thinking went, free speech was just speech, nothing more and nothing less. The best way to deal with the most appalling speakers would be to ignore them, in the hope that they would go away or drown trying to be heard. That they wouldn’t survive the marketplace of ideas. It’s the same reason we tried to ignore Donald Trump for so long or at least failed to take him seriously. Or so I wrote in 2015. We tried to ignore Steve Bannon and Milo Yiannopoulos. We tried to ignore Ann Coulter and Richard Spencer. We ignored them for so long and for so hard that they now get to ignore us. And these days, people who used to feel free to shout and threaten are emboldened to punch, body-slam, and stab.

It is a short hop, we are learning, from “words can never hurt us” to actual sticks and stones and the attendant breaking of bones.

That is what has become of free speech in this country. That is why I was contemplating breaking up with it. I don’t think I’m alone, either. There are a lot of people out there who feel that they ignored racist, xenophobic, sexist white supremacists at their own peril, for months and years, when they should have been punching back. And now, a lot of people in my town are not quite sure what to do. Some liberals cheered when Richard Spencer was confronted at his gym and cheered again when Ann Coulter didn’t speak in the free speech haven of Berkeley, California. Some have decided to meet what they perceive as violence with violence of their own: A growing list of “anti-fascist” groups have announced they are willing to use “direct action” against their foes if necessary. Many progressives are sick and tired because they have found that their attempts to protect free speech have resulted in a world that is not flush with the reciprocal exchange of ideas, but one that is shimmering with the threat of imminent violence and the daily fear that comes when you live with the possibility of that violence.

Cities that never worried about much beyond trampled flora at their Memorial Day parades now need to prepare for protests as if they are riots in the making, at tremendous cost to our collective psyche. Consider the choices available to the mayor of Portland, Oregon, after two men, Taliesin Myrddin Namkai-Meche and Ricky John Best, were stabbed to death as they tried to stop a white supremacist from harassing two young women on the light rail. Portland is in a state with robust constitutional speech protections. It has also suffered a long and frightening string of racial incidents in recent months. The white supremacist who killed two men in May had attended “free speech” rallies. And now at similar rallies everywhere, including my hometown, protesters on both sides are prepared for violence. Violence, these days, is almost expected. The only question seems to be whether cities will try to prevent bloodshed before it can happen. It’s why, immediately following the stabbings, that Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler tried to revoke permits for future alt-right protests altogether.

Of course, per the U.S. Constitution, Wheeler could not revoke these permits and stop these events regardless of how good his intentions were. And they were good: “My main concern is that they are coming to peddle a message of hatred and of bigotry,” he had told reporters. “They have a First Amendment right to speak, but my pushback on that is that hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.” Unfortunately, he is wrong as a matter of fact and of First Amendment doctrine because if Nazis get to march in Skokie, Illinois, racists can march in Portland. (The ACLU of Oregon quickly reminded him of this on Twitter, pointing out that “The government cannot revoke or deny a permit based on the viewpoint of the demonstrators. Period.”) Soon, Mayor Wheeler’s office was walking back the claim that he was calling to suppress speech, saying he was simply trying to avoid physical violence. As an attorney friend in Portland reminded me, this is exactly why elected officials have attorneys, so they can say, “I wanted to cancel the rallies, but my lawyers wouldn’t let me.”

The conundrum facing Wheeler, though, is the conundrum facing us all. It’s the same one that has been plaguing me: Is the First Amendment allowing us to batter and attack one another in ways that are more pernicious than the act of silencing speech? Why is my city, roiled and bruised by the events of May, still allowing the KKK to march here next month?

So far in Charlottesville, we have kept violence at bay. But that fact has not felt like a promise. Last Wednesday morning, some of the white nationalists announced plans to gather again. The police showed up in full force, as did counter-protesters organized by local faith groups. Actually, the counter-protesters outnumbered the alleged white supremacists by about 30 to 1. Everyone I spoke to was anxious. That, not politics, was hanging in the air. The faith groups were trying to guess at who would pull a knife; the young man who had been hassled by the Richard Spencer crowd back in May for wearing a yarmulke was back, again in his yarmulke. Nobody knew which guy might be the guy—the one with the knife, or even the gun.

The scene wasn’t as clear-cut as you might think a confrontation between white supremacists and anti-white supremacists would be. A local candidate for city council, Kenneth Jackson, was off to the side trying to talk. He was there with the support of Jason Kessler, one of about four white supremacists in attendance. Both wanted the Robert E. Lee statue to remain standing. Jackson is black and gay. Kessler made headlines last week after he “covered” the torch-march for the Daily Caller; his piece declined to mention that in addition to attending, he’d been a speaker celebrating Holocaust denialism and white superiority. His article still stands, a valoric love song to white supremacy, now with an editor’s note appended that reads “The author notified The Daily Caller after publication that he spoke at a luncheon May 14 on behalf of an effort to preserve the monument.” After spending the subsequent weeks being harassed everywhere he went, he was back in the park. He carried a megaphone he did not use.

I'm libertarian, anti-GMO, and vegan. Freelee The Banana Girl, VeganGMO Unnatural Vegan, PETA, and HSUS are pro-GMO fake vegans.